Archive for the ‘Moodle’ Category

February 19th, 2009 By Jeremy Lundberg 2 Comments »

MedBiquitous Abstract Accepted!

I am pleased to announce that my colleague, Logan Thomison of OptumHealth Education and I will be presenting at the MedBiquitous Annual Conference 2009, April 28-30 in Baltimore, Maryland. We will be discussing our collaborative production of a full-featured eCME Web platform by integrating two leading open source applications. Here is the abstract that was accepted:

The Role of Open Source Web Technologies in Continuing Medical Education: A case study

The rapid emergence and evolution of open-source Web technologies are transforming the delivery and measurement of continuing medical education (CME). Today, healthcare organizations are able to leverage, customize, and integrate free, open source software applications to create innovative, collaborative learning environments that facilitate communication, collaboration, and the transfer of knowledge among healthcare professionals.

OptumHealth Education and DLC Solutions partnered together to create a full-featured Web platform for CME. The platform was designed to: 1) facilitate learning through access to learner-driven communication tools, SCORM-compliant courseware, and live activities; 2) streamline and reduce costs associated with CME program administration and data collection; and 3) conduct education outcomes studies by combining data from multiple public and proprietary sources. The Web platform was developed by integrating two industry-leading open source applications: Drupal and Moodle. Drupal is a comprehensive content management system with rich Web 2.0 features. Moodle is a SCORM-compliant, collaborative learning management system widely used by universities and associations.

This presentation will discuss the authors’ experience in the planning, development, and implementation of this open-source CME platform. Special attention will be given to describing the feature set, the benefits and limitations of the platform, and the integration of multiple data sources for outcomes analysis.

November 13th, 2008 By Jeremy Lundberg Comments Off

Moodle Learning Management System

Watch how DLC Solutions is leveraging and customizing Moodle, the industry-leading, open source learning management system, for continuing medical education. This brief video shows how easy it is for learners to register, select and review a course, complete a scored assessment, and receive a certificate. In addition, we highlight some of the core reporting functionality. Moodle can be completely customized and integrated with other robust application such as Drupal CMS.

September 16th, 2008 By Jeremy Lundberg Comments Off

Moodle Gains Traction in the Higher Education Market

A recent article in The Chronicle of Higher Education highlights how academic centers (big and small) are now considering open source learning management systems (eg, Moodle), as an alternative to the dominant, commercial software, Blackboard. Universities, including UCLA and the Georgia Institute of Technology, have implemented Moodle across their campuses to reduce costs and take advantage of the software’s rich features and large developer community.

We are working extensively with the Moodle these days to help our healthcare clients more effectively manage and deliver their medical education activities and we could not be happier with the results. Glad to see the uptake!

September 15th, 2008 By Jeremy Lundberg Comments Off

3-D Healthcare Learning Environments

I have written before on the vast potential of 3-D platforms as a natural extension of the Web for medical education and there is a wonderful new JMIR article by Margaret Hansen entitled, “Versatile, Immersive, Creative and Dynamic Virtual 3-D Healthcare Learning Environments: A Review of the Literature” that is worth checking out. The author provides an overview of the different environments, weighs their pros and cons, and calls for more research in this emerging area of elearning.

Here are some of my thoughts on three of the platforms discussed in the article:

  • Second Life: Probably the most well-known of the immersive platforms, Second Life (SL) enables authors to create their own content, supports various types of interactive media (eg, VoIP, audio, video), and can integrate with Web APIs and backend learning management systems, such as Moodle, for outcomes analysis and CME administration. Academic centers and government agencies, including the Centers for Disease Control have setup shop in SL with various projects and IBM has invested millions of dollars in SL development. The primary limitation I see hindering the broader use of SL in medical education is the requirement to download and install a separate client application to participate “in-world.” This practice is usually frowned upon or prohibited by network administrators (for legitimate reasons) at large organizations, such as medical centers and pharmaceutical companies, unless their is an internal commitment to SL as a training platform. The open source nature of the SL client application may lessen of those security concerns.
  • Lively by Google: This is Google’s much anticipated move into the 3-D Web. The newly released service lets authors create avatars and rooms from pre-canned templates and embed them into Web pages. Lively supports chat and YouTube video streaming into your room. I can see this app as a low cost way to conduct patient support groups or video presentations as you can restrict access to the room with usernames and passwords. However, the template and avatar design are clearly aimed at teens and, in the current version, there is no support for external LMS support or for Mac. But its Google and I am sure that they will have many new enhancements in the near future, including user-generated content, Mac support, and API integration.
  • ALIVE: ALIVE: Advanced Learning and Immersive Virtual Environments is an initiative by the University of Southern Queensland designed to create an easy-to-use, drag and drop tool for producing Web-based learning tools. Out of the gate, I will admit that I was unable to install the DXviewer (despite meeting the stated system requirements) required to view the learning objects. I did watch a number of YouTube tutorials the group has published and it looks interesting. I cannot comment anymore in this post without successfully installing their components and giving them a fair shake. I will say that any efforts to make 3-D publishing directly to the Web has my support!

Overall, I agree with the author on many of her conclusions and believe that 3-D immersive environments hold great promise for health education.

September 12th, 2008 By Jeremy Lundberg Comments Off

To Open Source or Not To Open Source…That is the Question

The recent expansion of open source Web and e-learning technologies to continuing medical education, pharmaceutical training, and consumer health will have a significant impact upon multiple aspects of our healthcare system. Prior to 2004, there was a blind allegiance to using big brand, proprietary technologies, such as Microsoft .NET and WebEx, to create online training initiatives. This approach was often expensive and offered little in the way of real innovation and measurable outcomes. In fact, educators didn’t think much about IT’s selections, programmers did not know much about e-learning best practices, and many seemed happy to post a static Website with a couple PDF or PowerPoint files, and stamp it “e-learning.”

Today, things are changing for the better. Best practices for content and technology are being published, outcomes measurement is being discussed, and recent Web innovations are changing the way people use the Web. Commonly referred to as Web 2.0, this phenomenon describes the read/write nature of people’s interactions with Websites and the peer-to-peer networking, communication, and content generation. As a result, there is a high demand for new software that is stable, inexpensive, and can be easily customized with new features. Many proprietary software companies have not been able to keep up with demand and the speed of the ever changing technology environment. Consequently, ehealth firms such as ours who have long embraced the open source movement are able fill that gap and provide academic medical centers, pharmaceutical and medical device firms, hospitals, and medical associations with robust Web communication and training platforms at a fraction of the cost and production time of proprieatary vendors.

All though there are many open source applications, we continue to be very enthusiastic about our experience with two open source platforms that we believe are “game changers” in health communications:

  • Drupal: A robust content management system equipped with powerful features, such as: peer-to-peer networking, content personalization, role-based publishing, blogs, discussion forums, multimedia support, news syndication and much more. Drupal has an enormous community of contributing software developers, which have contributed over 4,000 additional modules/features freely available online.
  • Moodle: Largely considered the best on the market, this full-featured learning management system is perfect for continuing medical education and pharmaceutical salestraining. The software can be fully customized to integrate with membership databases, manage registrations, administer courses, assessments, and certificates, and conduct outcomes reporting all from a Web interface. The system support all types of courseware, including SCORM and video, and is 508-compliant.

Key advantages of open source software:

  1. Freedom: You have the source code and, therefore, you have he freedom to customize that application to function as exactly how you would like.
  2. No Licensing Fees: While there are software development costs associated configuration and hosting, there are no licensing fees like you see when you purchase Windows Vista or Microsoft Office.
  3. Collective Wisdom: Most well-established open source platforms, such as Moodle and Drupal, have hundreds or thousands of programmers who contribute code to improve the functionality, address security, and provide support. It is one of the most exciting aspects about the open source movement.
  4. Mash-Ups: Given that the source code is freely available, you combine one application with another to develop a completely new feature set and/or application.
  5. Decreased production cycle: You have the source code, the documentation, and access to a community of fellow developers. Combine that with an intuitive user experience, clean design, and sound planning/customization/testing, and you will quickly see a return on your investment.
  6. Too many more to list…